![]() Over the years, there have been a LOT of chromium studies. That's a pretty good trick, except neither of these claims is true. This mineral was promoted back then to help people lose weight and build muscle simultaneously. Chromium is what first sparked my interest in dietary supplements in the 1990s. ChromiumĬhromium (aka chromium picolinate) is the most overly hyped weight loss supplement in recent history. Watch on my Youtube channel if you prefer. Despite their popularity, the research almost overwhelmingly shows exogenous ketone supplements do not work. You can purchase exogenous ketones by themselves, which are found in many supplements. Since the ketogenic diet produces fast weight loss and raises ketone levels in the blood, the idea is to just raise your ketone levels artificially and weight loss will occur. You have to take them as a dietary supplement. Exogenous Ketone SupplementsĮxogenous ketones are ketones that are not made in the body naturally. See the raspberry ketone review for more information. If you are taking ketogenic supplements and seeing raspberry ketones as an ingredient, you have been scammed.īottom line: I think raspberry ketones are a total scam. Why have none of them pumped any of that money into a good quality human weight loss study? Raspberry Ketone Weight Loss Researchīecause it's easier to toss up a sexy website and make people think it works.įor the record, raspberry ketones have nothing to do with the ketogenic diet or being in ketosis. We are not mice, so I discount evidence like that.Ĭompanies have made millions of dollars peddling this ridiculous supplement. The only “ proof” I see are 2 mouse studies. I can't find any human clinical trials showing raspberry ketones facilitates weight loss. Oz once called raspberry ketones a “miracle in a bottle that burned your fat.” Words like this shot this eunuch of a supplement to weight loss fame. Raspberry ketones is another popular weight loss supplement that falls far short of being the miracle it's portrayed on the web. See the Garcinia Cambogia review for more insights. This is another reason I can't recommend it.īased on the all-over-the-place results from human trials – and the possibility of liver failure as a side effect – I can't in good conscience recommend anyone consider garcinia cambogia as an effective weight loss supplement.īottom line: Until I see better proof, I remain skeptical. But, in some instances, studies finding it didn't work used more garcinia than those showing it did work.Īnswer: most clinical trials on garcinia are of low quality. In full disclosure, yes, there have been some studies showing it works. Since then, at least 4 other human trials have demonstrated garcinia Cambodia's lack of weight-loss ability. The result: After 3 months, those taking garcinia Cambogia did not lose more weight than the placebo group. Three months is enough time to see if it worked. Both groups were given a low-calorie diet to follow. In one study, researchers randomly gave 135 men and women either 1500 mg of garcinia Cambogia or a placebo and followed them for 3 whole months. The idea sounds wonderful – except I have no faith it really works.Īs far back as the 1990s, researchers put garcinia Cambogia to the test – and it failed miserably. It's also said to reduce hunger by regulating serotonin levels. The idea is garcinia is supposed to block carbs from turning into fat. Garcinia Cambogia also called hydroxy citric acid (HCA) has been around for decades. You may have even watched videos of it being touted as the magic weight-loss bullet used by celebrities. Garcinia cambogia is hyped all over the internet on both legitimate – and scummy – websites. How many weight loss supplements contain this dud? Too many to count.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |